ABSTRACT
ABSTRACT BACKGROUND: Hypovitaminosis D is a public health problem associated with several chronic inflammatory and immunological diseases, including psoriasis. OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to determine the prevalence of hypovitaminosis D in patients with plaque psoriasis. A comparison was made between vitamin D levels in patients with psoriasis and those with other non-inflammatory dermatoses without photosensitivity. In addition, it evaluated the effects of the patients' Fitzpatrick skin phototype and the season of the year on the serum levels of vitamin D. DESIGN AND SETTINGS: A retrospective cross-sectional study was conducted at an outpatient clinic in a university center in Juiz de Fora (MG), Brazil. METHODS: A review of dermatology patients' demographic data, including skin phototype and serum levels of 25-hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH)D], over 12 months in 2016. RESULTS: This study included 554 patients: 300 patients allocated to the plaque psoriasis group and 254 control patients with other dermatological diseases. Regarding the season of the year, 229, 132, 62, and 131 participants were evaluated in summer, autumn, winter, and spring, respectively. As for the skin phototype, 397, 139, and 18 patients had phototypes III, IV, and V, respectively. The serum levels of 25(OH)D were significantly lower in the psoriasis group (24.91 ± 7.16 ng/mL) than in the control group (30.37 ± 8.14 ng/mL). CONCLUSIONS: Hypovitaminosis D (< 30 ng/mL) was present in 76.66% of patients with psoriasis versus 53.94% of control patients. Vitamin D deficiency (< 20 ng/mL) was observed in 25% of the patients with psoriasis versus 8.66% in the control group (P < 0.001). The season and patient's skin phototype were independent predictors of serum vitamin D levels.
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE@#To observe the clinical efficacy of moxibustion combined with coptis chinensis ointment sealing on plaque psoriasis complicated with obesity.@*METHODS@#A total of 52 patients of plaque psoriasis complicated with obesity were randomized into an observation group (26 cases) and a control group (26 cases, 2 cases dropped off). Coptis chinensis ointment sealing was adopted in the control group. On the basis of the treatment in the control group, moxibustion was applied at ashi point (area of local target lesions), Zhongwan (CV 12) and bilateral Zusanli (ST 36), Fenglong (ST 40), Quchi (LI 11), Tianshu (ST 25), Shangjuxu (ST 37) in the observation group. The treatment was given 30 min each time, once a day for 4 weeks in both groups. The psoriasis area and severity index (PASI) score, obesity related indexes (body mass, waist circumference, body mass index [BMI]), triglyceride, cholesterol, uric acid and plasma glucose were compared before and after treatment, and the clinical efficacy was evaluated in the two groups.@*RESULTS@#After treatment, the PASI scores were decreased compared with those before treatment in the two groups (P<0.01), and the PASI score in the observation group was lower than that in the control group (P<0.05); the body mass, waist circumference, BMI, triglyceride, cholesterol, uric acid and plasma glucose were decreased compared with those before treatment in the observation group (P<0.01, P<0.05), the triglyceride and cholesterol in the observation group were lower than those in the control group (P<0.05). The total effective rate was 53.8% (14/26) in the observation group, which was superior to 20.8% (5/24) in the control group (P<0.05).@*CONCLUSION@#Moxibustion combined with coptis chinensis ointment sealing can effectively improve the clinical symptoms in patients of plaque psoriasis complicated with obesity.
Subject(s)
Humans , Moxibustion , Blood Glucose , Ointments , Uric Acid , Psoriasis/therapy , Triglycerides , Obesity/therapyABSTRACT
Objective:To compare the efficacy and safety of biologics versus methotrexate in the treatment of severe pediatric plaque psoriasis.Methods:A retrospective matched case-control study was carried out. Twenty children with severe plaque psoriasis from Beijing Children′s Hospital, Capital Medical University from June 2016 to November 2021 were included in this study, and the patients treated with biologics (adalimumab or secukinumab) were matched with those treated with methotrexate at a ratio of 1∶1 according to the psoriasis area and severity index (PASI) score and age. PASI, physician′s global assessment (PGA) , and body surface area (BSA) scores were assessed at weeks 4, 8 and 12 after the start of treatment, and adverse drug reactions were recorded. Statistical analysis was mainly carried out by using Mann-Whitney U test, Fisher′s exact test and generalized estimating equations. Results:At weeks 4 and 8, the proportions of patients achieving PASI75 and PASI90 were significantly higher in the biologics group (PASI75: 7/10, 10/10, PASI90: 5/10, 9/10, respectively) than in the methotrexate group (PASI75: 1/10, 5/10, PASI90: 0, 1/10, respectively; all P < 0.05) , while there was no significant difference between the biologics group and methotrexate group at week 12 (PASI75: 10/10 vs. 8/10, PASI90: 9/10 vs. 4/10, both P > 0.05) . There were no significant differences in the PASI, BSA or PGA scores between the two groups at baseline (all P > 0.05) , while the biologics group showed significantly decreased PASI and BSA scores at weeks 4, 8 and 12, and significantly decreased PGA score at week 8 compared with the methotrexate group (PASI: Z = 2.50, 3.56, 2.63, respectively; BSA: Z = 2.87, 3.57, 2.40, respectively; PGA: Z = 2.81; all P<0.05) . Analysis of changes over time showed that the PASI, PGA and BSA scores in the biologics group significantly decreased at weeks 4, 8 and 12 compared with those at baseline (all P<0.01) ; the PASI and PGA scores significantly decreased at weeks 8 and 12 compared with the corresponding scores at week 4 (all P<0.05) ; however, there were no significant differences in the PASI, PGA or BSA scores between week 12 and 8 (all P>0.05) . In the methotrexate group, the PASI, PGA and BSA scores at weeks 4, 8 and 12 were all significantly lower than the corresponding scores at the previous adjacent time points (all P<0.05) . There was no significant difference in the incidence of adverse reactions between the two groups ( P = 0.650) , and no serious adverse reactions occurred in either group. The main adverse reaction was infection in the biologics group, while infection and elevation of transaminase levels were common in the methotrexate group. Conclusion:Biologics and methotrexate were both effective and safe for the treatment of severe pediatricplaque psoriasis, and biologics facilitated rapider achievement of PASI75 and PASI90 compared with methotrexate.
ABSTRACT
Tapinarof is a novel topical formulation approved recently, in May 2022, by the United States Food and Drug Administration to treat plaque psoriasis. Existing topical therapies for psoriasis are limited by systemic and local adverse effects, medication cost and repeated administration, thus significantly hampering the compliance of patients to therapy. These limitations can be resolved by tapinarof owing to its better efficacy and favourable safety profile in psoriasis management. Tapinarof was developed with a unique mechanism targeting the aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AhR) involved in inflammation and modulation of skin barrier integrity in inflammatory dermatological disorders such as psoriasis and atopic dermatitis. The efficacy and safety outcomes of tapinarof in psoriasis were justified through the two pivotal clinical trials, namely, PSOARING 1 and PSOARING 2. The common adverse effects observed with tapinarof are folliculitis, contact dermatitis and headache. The literature search was conducted for efficacy and safety of tapinarof in the electronic databases of PubMed and Cochrane using a combination of keywords such as tapinarof, psoriasis and AhR. This review will delineate the molecular mechanisms underlying the action of tapinarof and also summarise the trial data supporting the claim that tapinarof is replacing the existing standard of care in psoriasis management.
ABSTRACT
Objetivo: Os agentes biológicos representam um grande avanço no tratamento da psoríase em placas moderada a grave. No entanto, variações de eficácia, segurança e custos dos tratamentos podem dificultar a escolha do agente terapêutico. Este estudo teve como objetivo atualizar o custo por resposta dos agentes biológicos disponíveis para psoríase no ROL de Procedimentos e Eventos em Saúde (ROL) da Agência Nacional de Saúde Suplementar (ANS). Métodos: Uma análise de custo por resposta foi utilizada para avaliar a razão de custo pelo desfecho Índice de Gravidade e Área da Psoríase (PASI) 90. Os resultados foram apresentados para o primeiro ano (ano I), que compreende a fase de indução e a fase manutenção até completar 52 semanas e foi realizada uma análise da efetividade do tratamento num cenário de orçamento fixo. Os custos dos tratamentos foram calculados com base nos preços de fábrica (PF18%) da Tabela da Câmara de Regulação do Mercado de Medicamentos de junho de 2021. Resultados: Para o ano I, o guselcumabe apresentou melhor resultado para custo por resposta (R$ 130.467) PASI 90, seguido por ixequizumabe, ustequinumabe, secuquinumabe, adalimumabe, infliximabe e etanercepte. No cenário com orçamento fixo, o guselcumabe demonstrou ser o agente capaz de tratar com sucesso (PASI 90) o maior número de pacientes. Atualização do custo-efetividade por resposta para psoríase em placas moderada a grave. Conclusão: Sob a perspectiva do Sistema de Saúde Suplementar do Brasil, o guselcumabe apresentou o melhor custo por resposta PASI 90, sendo, assim, a terapia com melhor custo-efetividade no tratamento da psoríase em placas moderada a grave disponível no ROL.
Objective: Biological agents represent a major advance in the treatment of moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis. However, variations of efficiency, safety and costs of treatments make it difficult to select the drug. This study aims to update the cost per response of biological agents available in the Health Procedures and Events Roll (ROL) of the National Supplementary Health Agency (ANS). Methods: A cost-per-response analysis was used to assess the cost per outcome of Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) 90. Results were presented for the first year (I), which comprises induction and maintenance for 52 weeks and a fixed budget scenario analysis. Treatment costs were calculated based on the prices of the 2021 Medicines Market Regulation Chamber Table. Results: Analysis of year I, guselkumab showed the best result for cost per cost (R$ 130,467) PASI 90, followed by ixekizumab, ustekinumab, secukinumab, adalimumab, infliximab, and etanercept. In the fixedbudget analysis, guselkumab is the therapy capable of successfully treating (PASI 90) the largest number of patients. Conclusion: From the perspective of the Supplementary Health System in Brazil, guselkumab showed the best cost per response PASI 90, thus being the most cost-effective therapy in the treatment of moderate to severe plaque psoriasis available in the Brazilian ROL.
Subject(s)
Psoriasis , Supplemental Health , Cost-Effectiveness AnalysisABSTRACT
The most widely prescribed drugs for the treatment of a variety of dermatoses are Topical corticosteroids (TC). These medications are approved for the treatment of inflammatory and pruritic manifestations of dermatologic disorders due to their powerful symptom-relieving impact. Clobetasol propionate (CP) is the most popular (TC) used to relieve itching, redness, and oedema caused by a variety of skin disorders. Anti-inflammatory, anti-pruritic, and vasoconstrictive characteristics are all present in it. CP works by binding to cytoplasmic glucocorticoid receptors and activating glucocorticoid receptor-mediated gene expression, resulting in the production of anti-inflammatory proteins while suppressing the production of inflammatory mediators. The formulation is free from known contact allergens, such as propylene glycol, short-chain alcohols, and sorbitol-based emulsifiers, and has demonstrated hypoallergenic effects. The efficacy, safety, and clinical experience of utilizing CP 0.025% cream for the treatment of various dermatologic disorders are discussed in this case series
ABSTRACT
Psoriasis is an immune-mediated chronic recurrent inflammatory disease, and biological agents targeting cytokines and their receptors involved in its pathogenesis have become an increasingly important option for its treatment in recent years. With the successive appearance of biological agents such as secukinumab and ustekinumab on the market in China, the use of biologics will become increasingly common in the treatment of psoriasis. This review summarizes the efficacy of different biological agents and individualized drug selection in the treatment of moderate to severe plaque psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis, with a view to providing a reference for physicians in clinical practice.
ABSTRACT
ABSTRACT BACKGROUND: Psoriatic arthritis is the most frequent and impactful comorbidity among psoriatic patients and appears in most cases after skin disease. Dermatologists play a key role in its early diagnosis and treatment. OBJECTIVE: To determine the prevalence of psoriatic arthritis and associated variables among patients with plaque psoriasis seen at a reference center for treating psoriasis. DESIGN AND SETTING: Retrospective cross-sectional study conducted among 300 patients at an outpatient clinic in a university center in Juiz de Fora, MG, Brazil. METHODS: Standardized records of 300 patients with plaque psoriasis were examined. Demographic data and medical variables relating to psoriasis (Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI), family history, age at onset and disease progression) and psoriasis arthritis (CASPAR criteria) were evaluated. Laboratory and radiographic tests in the medical records were reviewed. RESULTS: Seventy-three (24.3%) of these 300 patients with plaque psoriasis had psoriatic arthritis. Asymmetric oligoarthritis (58.9%) was the most common clinical form, followed by polyarthritis (20.5%), distal interphalangeal arthritis (15.2%) and spondyloarthritis (5.4%). Dactylitis was present in 21.9% and enthesitis in 35.6% of patients. Compared with patients without arthritis, patients with arthritis had higher average age, higher frequency of positive family history of psoriasis, longer duration of evolution and higher PASI rates. CONCLUSION: Psoriatic arthritis is often underdiagnosed. Since dermatologists perform the initial approach, these professionals need to be trained to diagnose this comorbidity and treat it, together with rheumatologists.
Subject(s)
Humans , Psoriasis/complications , Psoriasis/epidemiology , Arthritis, Psoriatic/diagnosis , Arthritis, Psoriatic/epidemiology , Brazil/epidemiology , Prevalence , Cross-Sectional Studies , Retrospective StudiesABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE@#To observe the short-term and long-term effects of moxibustion on plaque psoriasis of blood stasis, and to compare the curative effect between moxibustion and calcipotriol ointment.@*METHODS@#A total of 80 patients with plaque psoriasis of blood stasis were randomly divided into an observation group (40 cases, 2 cases dropped off) and a control group (40 cases, 4 cases dropped off). Both groups were given routine medical vaseline topical emollient basic treatment. In the observation group, moxibustion was applied to @*RESULTS@#After treatment, the PASI scores in the both groups were lower than before treatment (@*CONCLUSION@#Both moxibustion and calcipotriol ointment have good short-term effects on plaque psoriasis of blood stasis. Moxibustion has more advantages in reducing the recurrence rate of psoriasis, improving the main clinical symptoms of TCM and quality of life.
Subject(s)
Humans , Acupuncture Points , Moxibustion , Psoriasis/drug therapy , Quality of Life , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE：To evaluate the drug economy of ixekizumab in the treatment of moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis. METHODS： Literatures were retrieved from PubMed ， Embase， The Cochrane Library ， CNKI and Wanfang database ， supplemented by manual search ，search time from the database establishment to Oct. 31st，2019，using Chinese and English search terms included “Ixekizumab”“Taltz”“Psoriasis”“Pharmacoeconomics”“Cost-benifit analysis ”“Cost-effectiveness analysis ” “Cost-utility analysis ”，etc. The literatures were screened according to inclusion and exclusion criteria. Relevant pharmacoeconomic studies about ixekizumab in the treatment of moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis were collected ，and the study methods and pharmacoeconomic evaluation results were summarized. RESULTS ：A total of 8 literatures were included ，involving 9 studies. The overall quality of the studies was high. All the studies were distributed in foreign countries such as Canada ，the United States and the United Kingdom. All the studies adopted Markov model. The health outcomes showed that ixekizumab could bring more quality-adjusted life years. Compared with methotrexate combined with phototherapy ，infliximab，ustekinumab and secukinumab ， the incremental cost-utility ratio （ICUR）of ixekizumab was different in different studies. CONCLUSIONS ：Ixekizumab has certain economic advantages for the treatment of moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis ，but there is still a lack of relevant research in China and it is urgent to carry out relevant research suitable for Chinese.
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE：To systematically evaluate the efficacy and safety of guselkumab in the treatment of moderate-to- severe plaque psoriasis ，and to provide evidence-based reference for the clinical treatment. METHODS ：Retrieved from PubMed ， Embase，Cochrane Library ，CNKI，VIP，Wanfang database during inception to Oct. 2019，randomized controlled trials （RCTs） about guselkumab versus placebo/positive control in the treatment of moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis were collected. After literature screening and data extraction ，quality evaluation was performed by using the bias risk evaluation tool recommended by the Cochrane System evaluator manual 5.1.0. Meta-analysis was performed by using Stata 16.0 software. RESULTS ：Eight RCTs with a total of 3 488 patients were included. The results of Meta-analysis indicated that the proportion of patients who achieved 90％ reduction or more from baseline of psoriasis area and severity index （PASI）in guselkumab group was significantly higher than that placebo group [RR ＝26.72，95％CI（15.98，44.70），P＜0.001]，adaliumumab group [RR ＝1.45，95％CI（1.32，1.59）， P＜0.001] and secukinumab group （P＜0.000 1）. The proportion of patients with Investigator ’s Global Assessment （IGA）score of 0 or 1 in guselkumab group was significantly better than placebo group [RR ＝11.15，95％ CI（8.22，15.14），P＜0.001] and adaliumumab group [RR ＝1.27，95％CI（1.19，1.35），P＜0.001]. The proportion of patients with IGA score of 0，the proportion of patients who achieved 75％ reduction or more from baseline of PASI ，dermatology life qu ality index score of 0 or 1 in guselkumab group were signifi cantly superior than placebo group and adaliumumab gr oup，the proportion of patients who achieved 100％ reduction from baseline of PASI in guselkumab group Lewx- was significantly superior than placebo group （P＜0.05）， inn@outlook.com there was no significant difference compared with adaliumumab group （P＞0.05）. There was no statistical significance in the proportion of patients with IGA score of and other secondary outcome indicators between guselkumab and secukinumab group （P＞0.05）. In the safety indicators as total incidence rate of ADR ，rate of withdrawl due to ADR ，etc. ，there was no statistical significance between guselkumab and placebo/ adalimumab groups （P＞0.05）. CONCLUSIONS ：Guselkumab is superior to placebo ，adaliumumab and secukinumab in improving the symptoms of moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis with good safety .
ABSTRACT
Psoriasis is a chronic, multisystem inflammatory disease with predominantly skin and joint involvement. In Ayurveda all skin diseases are described under the umbrella of Kushtha. Ayurvedic system of medicine is giving good results in management of Psoriasis. Repeated Samshodhana (purificatory therapies) along with Samshamana (palliative therapies) is the main line of treatment if skin diseases in Ayurveda. Three assessments were taken before and after treatment on scoring of Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI), Psoriasis Disability Index (PDI) and PASI score. Score of the patient was 63.3% before treatment and 13.3% after treatment and 3.3% after follow up on Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI), 44.4% before treatment and 15.5% after treatment and 5.3% after follow up on Psoriasis Disability Index (PDI) and 24.5% before treatment, 5.1% after treatment and 1.2% after follow up in PASI (Psoriasis Area and Severity Index). This case study wants to substantiate the effectiveness of Ayurvedic treatment in the management of Plaque psoriasis.
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE@#To observe the clinical effectiveness and safety of fire-needle therapy, an external approach of Chinese medicine in treating plaque psoriasis.@*METHODS@#This study was a two-parallel-arm randomized controlled trial. A total of 151 participants with plaque psoriasis were randomly assigned to the fire-needle therapy group (treatment group, 76 cases) or the control group (75 cases) at a 1:1 allocation ratio using SAS software. All participants received Oral Huoxue Jiedu Decoction (, HXJDD) and applied externally vaseline cream twice a day. Participants in the treatment group received fire-needle therapy once weekly for 4 weeks plus HXJDD and vaseline cream applied the same as the control group. The primary outcome measure was Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) score, and the secondary outcomes were Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQL), and Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAMA), as well as Chinese medicine (CM) syndrome score and photos of target lesions. The indices were evaluated before and after treatment.@*RESULTS@#Sixty-eight patients in each group completed the study. The treatment group has not yet achieved significant improvement in PASI score (P>0.05) compared to the control group. However, significant differences were found between the two groups in relieving CM syndrome (P<0.05) and improving quality of life (P<0.05).@*CONCLUSION@#Fire-needle appears to be safe and may have benefit for psoriasis, the short-term treatment and small sample size limit the conclusions of this study. Further rigorous randomized controlled trials with longer treatment are recommended.
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE： To evaluate the efficacy and safety of apremilast in the treatment of moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis systematically. METHODS： Retrieved from PubMed， Embase， Cochrane Library， VIP， CNKI and CBM， RCTs about apremilast or apremilast combined with other drugs （trial group） versus placebo （control group） in the treatment of moderate- to-severe plaque psoriasis were collected. Meta-analysis was conducted by using Rev Man 5.3 statistical software after literature screening， data extraction and quality evaluation with bias risk evaluation tool of Cochrane System Evaluator Manual 5.1.0. RESULTS： Totally 7 studies were included， involving 2 332 patients. Results of Meta-analysis showed that case number of psoriasis assessment and severity index （PASI） decreased by 75％ （PASI 75％） [OR＝6.44，95％CI（4.90，8.45），P＜0.000 01]， PASI 90％ [OR＝8.13， 95％CI（4.65， 14.22）， P＜0.000 01] and sPGA 0 or 1 [OR＝3.89，95％CI（3.00，5.05），P＜0.000 01]， the incidence of ADR [OR＝1.87，95％CI（1.44，2.43）， P＜0.000 01] in trial group were significantly more or higher than control group. Subgroup analysis by apremilast dose showed that case number of 20 mg PASI 75％ [OR＝4.72，95％CI（2.77，8.05），P＜0.000 01]， 30 mg PASI 75％ [OR＝7.05，95％CI（5.13，9.69），P＜0.000 01]， 20 mg PASI 90％ [OR＝4.27，95％CI（1.80，10.09），P＝0.001]， 30 mg PASI 90％ [OR＝11.11，95％CI（5.27，23.43），P＜0.000 01]， 20 mg sPGA 0 or 1 [OR＝2.82，95％CI（1.51，5.26），P＝0.001]， 30 mg sPGA 0 or 1 [OR＝4.13，95％CI（3.10，5.50），P＜0.000 01]， the incidence of 30 mg ADR [OR＝1.94，95％CI（1.51，2.49），P＜0.000 01] in trial group were significantly more or higher than control group. There was no statistical significance in the incidence of serious ADR [OR＝1.27，95％CI（0.77，2.07），P＝0.35] or case number of ADR leading to withdrawal [OR＝1.48，95％CI（1.00，2.20），P＝0.05] between 2 groups. CONCLUSIONS： Apremilast is effective for moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis in dose-dependent manner and improve the quality of life， but increase the incidence of ADR.
ABSTRACT
O OBJETIVO: deste estudo é avaliar o custo por resposta das terapias biológicas disponíveis no Brasil para o tratamento da psoríase em placas moderada a grave na perspectiva do Sistema de Saúde Suplementar. MÉTODOS: A resposta PASI 90 foi o desfecho avaliado neste estudo. Dados clíni-cos foram calculados com base na razão de risco de uma metanálise em rede, comparando adalimu-mabe, etanercepte, infliximabe, ixequizumabe, secuquinumabe e ustequinumabe a guselcumabe, cujo dado foi obtido no estudo clínico. Foram considerados apenas os custos de medicamentos. O caso-base avaliou o custo por resposta do ano de indução do tratamento. Além disso, conduziu-se uma análise de orçamento fixo. Em um cenário alternativo, analisou-se o custo por resposta do ano de manutenção. Uma análise de sensibilidade avaliou incertezas dos dados clínicos. RESULTADOS: O menor custo por resposta foi de guselcumabe (R$ 98.643), seguido de ixequizumabe (R$ 112.549), ustequinumabe (R$ 124.078), secuquinumabe (R$ 160.930), infliximabe (R$ 208.039), adalimumabe (R$ 208.686) e etanercepte (R$ 639.124). Resultados similares foram observados no cenário alterna-tivo, considerando os custos no ano de manutenção. Guselcumabe demonstrou ser a terapia que tratou mais pacientes com sucesso, considerando um cenário de orçamento fixo. Conclusão: O presente estudo demonstrou que, na perspectiva do Sistema de Saúde Suplementar brasileiro, gu-selcumabe possui o menor custo por resposta entre as terapias biológicas para psoríase em placas moderada a grave, além de tratar com sucesso mais pacientes em um cenário de orçamento fixo.
Objective: This study aims to evaluate the cost per response of the biologic therapies available for moderate to severe plaque psoriasis treatment in Brazil from a private payer perspective Methods: Treatment response evaluated in this study was the achievement of PASI 90. Clinical data was calculated based on the risk ratio of a network meta-analysis comparing adalimumab, etanercept, infliximab, ixekizumab, secukinumab and ustekinumab to guselkumab, which data was extracted from clinical trials. Only drug acquisition cost were considered. Base case analysis evaluated the first year of treatment cost per response Besides that, a fixed budget analysis was conducted. An alternative scenario analysis considered the maintenance year cost per response. A sensitivity analysis evaluated the clinical data uncertainties. Results: The lowest cost per response was obtained with guselkumab (R$98.643), followed by ixekizumab (R$ 112.549), ustekinumab (R$ 124.078), secukinumab (R$ 160.930), infliximab (R$ 208.039), adalimumab (R$ 208.686), and etanercept (R$ 639.124). Similar results were found in the alternative scenario, with maintenance year costs. Guselkumab demonstrated to be the therapy which successfully treats more patients with a fixed budget. Conclusion: In conclusion, this study demonstrated that, from the Brazilian private payer perspective, guselkumab presents the lowest cost per response among the avail-able biologic therapies for moderate to severe plaque psoriasis, and is able to successfully treat more patients in a limited budget scenario.
Subject(s)
Humans , Psoriasis , Biological Therapy , Costs and Cost Analysis , Supplemental HealthABSTRACT
Plaque Psoriasis, a common type of Psoriasis typically characterized by circular to oval red plaques distributed over extensors of body surface and scalp.The plaques usually exhibit scaling as a result of epidermal hyperproliferation and dermal inflammation with well defined sharply demarcated boundaries sometimes carry a violacious tint. Both early onset and a family history of disease are considered poor prognostic indicators. We here by presenting a case of chronic plaque psoriasis admitted to the IPD of SJIIM Hospital simulating the lakshanas of kitibhakushta treated with shodhna and shamana therapies with the objective of reducing the frequency of relapses,duration of remission and alleviating the symptoms.
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCCIÓN: Los tratamientos biológicos han aparecido como principal alternativa para el manejo de los pacientes con psoriasis en placa que no responden a tratamiento convencional, resultando necesario evaluar su real efectividad y seguridad. MÉTODOS: Realizamos una búsqueda en Epistemonikos, la mayor base de datos de revisiones sistemáticas en salud, la cual es mantenida mediante el cribado de múltiples fuentes de información, incluyendo MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane, entre otras. Extrajimos los datos desde las revisiones identificadas, analizamos los datos de los estudios primarios, realizamos un metanálisis y preparamos una tabla de resumen de los resultados utilizando el método GRADE. RESULTADOS Y CONCLUSIONES: Identificamos 21 revisiones sistemáticas que en conjunto incluyeron diez estudios primarios, todos correspondientes a ensayos aleatorizados. Concluimos que secukinumab logra mejoría clínica en pacientes con psoriasis en placa, aunque probablemente se asocia a efectos adversos graves.
INTRODUCTION: Biological treatments have appeared as the main alternative for the management of patients with plaque psoriasis that do not respond to conventional treatment. So, evaluating its actual efficacy and safety is needed. METHODS: We searched in Epistemonikos, the largest database of systematic reviews in health, which is maintained by screening multiple information sources, including MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane, among others. We extracted data from the systematic reviews, reanalyzed data of primary studies, conducted a meta-analysis and generated a summary of findings table using the GRADE approach. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: We identified 21 systematic reviews including ten studies overall, of which all were randomized trials. We concluded secukinumab achieves clinical improvement in patients with plaque psoriasis, although it is probably associated with serious adverse effects.
Subject(s)
Humans , Psoriasis/drug therapy , Dermatologic Agents/therapeutic use , Antibodies, Monoclonal/therapeutic use , Psoriasis/pathology , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Databases, Factual , Treatment Outcome , Dermatologic Agents/adverse effects , Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized , Antibodies, Monoclonal/adverse effectsABSTRACT
Etanercept has been shown to be effective for the treatment of moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis.Since most clinical trials examined etanercept in combination with other drugs,the efficacy and safety of etanercept monotherapy for moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis have not been well established.This prospective study enrolled 61 Chinese patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis to explore the efficacy and safety of etanercept monotherapy.These patients were treated with etanercept at a subcutaneous dose of 25 mg,twice a week,for 12 weeks.All the 61 patients completed the treatment and showed significant improvement in psoriasis area and severity index (PASI) scores.At 4,8,and 12 weeks after treatment,the response rates (PASI75) were 0％,21.31％,and 40.98％,respectively.It was concluded that etanercept monotherapy is efficacious and safe for patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Ustekinumab is a fully human monoclonal antibody approved for the treatment of chronic moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis in adults. However, factors including efficacy, tolerability, ease of use, and cost burden may affect ustekinumab utilization. Noncompliance may, in turn, affect treatment response. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate ustekinumab utilization in the real-world setting in Asia-Pacific countries. METHODS: In this phase 4 observational study conducted in Indonesia, Malaysia, Singapore, Korea, and Taiwan, adults with plaque psoriasis receiving ustekinumab were followed for up to 52 weeks. Study endpoints were the proportion of all patients using ustekinumab according to label-recommended intervals and the proportion of Korean patients who achieved a psoriasis area severity index 75 response at week 16. Safety was assessed by monitoring adverse events. RESULTS: Overall, 169 patients received ustekinumab (Korea, n=102; other countries, n=67). Just over half (56.2%) of patients used ustekinumab with the label-recommended interval from baseline to week 40; the proportion was higher in Korea (73.5%) than in other countries (29.9%), probably because ustekinumab was provided without charge for Korean patients up to week 40. Noncompliance increased after week 40 in Korea and from week 28 in other Asia-Pacific countries, with cost cited as the most common reason. At week 16, 56.9% of Korean patients achieved a Psoriasis Area Severity Index 75 response. Safety results were in line with those seen in previous studies. CONCLUSION: More than half of all patients in Asia-Pacific countries used ustekinumab as per the label-recommended dose interval, but reimbursement variations between countries may have confounded overall results.
Subject(s)
Adult , Humans , Compliance , Indonesia , Korea , Malaysia , Observational Study , Psoriasis , Singapore , Taiwan , UstekinumabABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Ustekinumab is a fully human monoclonal antibody approved for the treatment of chronic moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis in adults. However, factors including efficacy, tolerability, ease of use, and cost burden may affect ustekinumab utilization. Noncompliance may, in turn, affect treatment response. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate ustekinumab utilization in the real-world setting in Asia-Pacific countries. METHODS: In this phase 4 observational study conducted in Indonesia, Malaysia, Singapore, Korea, and Taiwan, adults with plaque psoriasis receiving ustekinumab were followed for up to 52 weeks. Study endpoints were the proportion of all patients using ustekinumab according to label-recommended intervals and the proportion of Korean patients who achieved a psoriasis area severity index 75 response at week 16. Safety was assessed by monitoring adverse events. RESULTS: Overall, 169 patients received ustekinumab (Korea, n=102; other countries, n=67). Just over half (56.2%) of patients used ustekinumab with the label-recommended interval from baseline to week 40; the proportion was higher in Korea (73.5%) than in other countries (29.9%), probably because ustekinumab was provided without charge for Korean patients up to week 40. Noncompliance increased after week 40 in Korea and from week 28 in other Asia-Pacific countries, with cost cited as the most common reason. At week 16, 56.9% of Korean patients achieved a Psoriasis Area Severity Index 75 response. Safety results were in line with those seen in previous studies. CONCLUSION: More than half of all patients in Asia-Pacific countries used ustekinumab as per the label-recommended dose interval, but reimbursement variations between countries may have confounded overall results.